Dumbledore, notorious for giving second chances Dumbledore, let Sirius rot in Azkaban for twelve years.
He must have known Sirius well due to his time in the Order, he must have known what James meant to Sirius. Dumbledore was a member of the freaking Wizengamot yet he didn’t fight the Ministry’s horrifying trial-optional policy.
This is a man who took back Death Eater!Snape at his word, shielded him from prison, and employed him at a school for children.
But he didn’t have a use for Sirius, so he didn’t care about him.
I got 99 problems with Dumbledore and his treatment of Sirius Black accounts for like 64 of them.
To be honest, Albus Dumbledore is one of the most disturbing, terrifying characters I’ve ever found in a book, because he thought he was a good guy and so did everyone else and the books don’t really challenge it either (given that Harry forgives him for everything he did), but when you look between the lines he was profoundly, profoundly immoral and unethical.
A couple of months ago, I was talking about HP characters with a friend, and he said that Dumbledore was one of his least favorite characters of all time.
Naturally, this took me back a bit since he’s one of the heroes of the series, misguided as he was at times. Still, I was curious and asked my friend why he hated him. His answer still strikes a chord with me.
"There is never, ever a reason to leave a child in an abusive home. Never."
Chris Durling as Enjolras in the 2014 Australian 25th Anniversary Production of Les Miserables.
the main traits associated with slytherin are “ambition, cunning, resourcefulness” etc
now i have nothing against slytherins. i headcanon natasha as a slytherin and shes my babe and i myself am a slytherin
BUT EXACTLY WHERE IN BUCKY BARNES’S STORY IS “AMBITION AND CUNNING”
LIKE RESOURCEFULNESS I GET, YEAH, DEFINITELY
BUT BUCKY’S LIFE REVOLVED AROUND PROTECTING + PROVIDING FOR STEVE, THEN FIGHTING FOR HIS COUNTRY AGAINST NAZIS, THEN DYING FOR STEVE FUCKIN ROGERS
it wasn’t ambition that made him go to war - if he wasn’t drafted (which is my headcanon but ok) then i’ll tell you right now, he signed up bc bucky barnes’s entire core personality is: stand up to the bullies, just like steve
he’s less fierce about it - steve will pick fights with anyone, while i feel like bucky mainly only steps in if some kid’s already getting beat up
but you bet your ass he wasn’t gonna let fuckin nazis slaughter half of europe
also, cunning? ????????? ?? ? bucky’s street smart and book smart (don’t forget that his smithsonian memorial said he was the top of his class) but…cunning has connotations of like: sly, scheming, crafty, etc
bucky’s not a fox
he’s a dog
if that makes sense
bucky’s in fucking gryffindor, because he’s brave and daring, he’s got the nerve, he’s got the chivalry (we saw how he treated the girls on that double date)
and he’s got that neverending, fierce, unbreakable even by 70 years of brainwashing loyalty to steve
BUCKY BARNES IS GRYFFINDOR U BEST BELIEVE.
edit: or even like, gryffinpuff but c’mon not slytherin
"Well girls, keep that in mind next time your friendzone somebody!"
THIS IS A TERROR CAMPAIGN
YOU’RE TELLING US YOU’LL LITERALLY MURDER US IF WE DON’T SPREAD OUR LEGS FOR YOU OR IF WE DON’T DATE YOU
THAT’S IT THAT’S THE WHOLE MESSAGE
YOU WANT US TO LIVE IN FEAR AND WE SURE DO
I WANT TO FUCKING CRY
ive come here to receive a rub
"Ocean Princess" | Thomas Bergersen
Les Mis Broadway 3-3-14
Kyle Scatliffe as Enjolras
Andy Mientus as Marius
John Rapson as Grantaire
Jason Forbach as Feuilly
This is probably the hottest thing I have ever seen! He literally does all of that with one hand.
Yeah, and when we look at this, most of us see Dean doing this. But do you ever think about how cool it is that (obvious, I know) Jensen can do everything Dean can do?
«Every time that cannon goes off, it’s music to my ears. I don’t care about any of them.»
Julie Andrews on how she got the part in Mary Poppins.
when walt fucking disney waits for you then you are the absolute queen of everything
i just took a quiz to find out which got house i’m in
In Defense of Sansa Stark
Sansa Stark must be one of the most hated characters in A Song of Ice and Fire. The vitriol levelled against her is often frightening in its intensity, surpassing that for actually horrific characters like Joffrey and Ramsey Bolton. Her crime? The unforgivable fact that she is a pre-teen girl.
As a massive fan of Sansa, even I must admit that she is difficult to like at first. She’s spoilt and a bit bratty. She fights with her fan-favorite sister and trusts characters who the reader knows are completely untrustworthy. She is hopelessly naive and lost in dreams of pretty princes and dashing knights. She acts, for all intents and purposes, like the eleven year old girl that she is. Most of us were pretty darn unbearable to older people at that age (and that’s fine, because they were also pretty unbearable to us). Robb and Jon, although older than Sansa, are similarly misguided and bratty, with Jon’s constant “poor me, I deserve so much more” attitude at the Wall, and Robb’s clumsy attempts at being the Lord of Winterfell. But these mistakes are only reprehensible to readers when they come from a girl, interested in girly things and making girly mistakes. Because viewers have been taught that “girly“ is automatically bad.
I love bad-ass, sword-wielding heroines as much as the next person (Arya and Brienne are two of my other favorite characters in anything ever), but the focus on this sort of female character — the oft-cited “strong female character” — seems to suggest that femininity is still bad, and that women can only be strong by adopting stereotypically male roles and attitudes. There’s nothing wrong with Arya declaring that being a Lady does not suit her and forging her own path, but saying that all female characters must take this attitude is as sexist and dismissive as saying that all female characters must be weak and take a backseat in events. Femininity is not bad, just as masculinity is not necessarily good.
Sansa plays an important role in the narrative, because she shows how societal expectations of women completely screw them over. She believes in everything that her parents and her septa have taught her. She believes in stories, and she believes that the greatest thing she can do is marry the prince (who will, of course, be chivalrous and honorable and handsome and kind) and have his children. She has spent her life in the cold castle of the North, dreaming of stories of tournaments and beauty in the south. Because people want her to be that way. That is how they think the ideal young woman should be. And it almost destroys her. Worse, it brings the reader’s hatred down on her, because even though women are told they are only “good” if they fit into this role, the role itself is seen as weak, manipulative, stupid and generally inferior. It is the Catch 22 of being a woman, both in Westeros and in our own world: no matter what you do, you are criticized, especially if you don’t act like Arya Stark and fight to become “one of the boys.” And so some “fans” of the series declare that they wish Sansa would get raped, a woman’s punishment for daring to act how she has been taught. For daring to act feminine, and making mistakes while doing so.
And all this hatred misses the fact that Sansa is one of the strongest individuals in the entire series. In a world where people drop like flies, in an abusive situation that would break so many people, Sansa survives. Sansa endures. She stays strong, and she never gives up. As Brienne says to Catelyn, she has a “woman’s courage.” She learns how to play the game. She wears her courtesy for her armor, and she listens, and she adapts, and she keeps her cards close to her chest. She learns how to smile and curtsey and use her words to keep going long after other, older, more experienced players, including her father, are destroyed. But she will not kneel. She will not weaken. She remains strong, and she remains determined, because the North remembers, and her day will come. Her “woman’s courage” keeps her alive and in the game where characters like Arya would not last five minutes.
Most impressive of all, Sansa maintains one key part of her personality that others might dismiss as “weak” or “feminine”: her kindness. She manages to be brave and gentle and caring, despite the trauma she goes through. She shows love and affection to little Robert and to Tommen. She puts herself at risk to save Ser Dontos, using her words and her courtesy to trick Joffrey into doing as she desires. She cares for and calms the people of King’s Landing during the Battle of the Blackwater, despite the fact that she is so young and so inexperienced and few of them have ever done anything to help her. She knows that if she were Queen, she would make the people love her, because she cares about other people, even when her own life is torn apart.
Traditional femininity is not innately inferior. It has its own kind of strength and its own kind of power, and Sansa Stark demonstrates that better than any other character I’ve encountered. She is not fierce or rebellious. She is not ruthless or brutal. But she is strong. She is a survivor. And that should not be dismissed.
remember when we found out Neville Longbottom had bigger balls than anyone else in the HP series
remember how Dumbledore told us this in the very first book, but no one believed him